In the case of Catharine Brown, colored, against the Washington, Alexandria and Georgetown Railroad Company to recover damages for personal injuries in being put out of the ladies' car, the Supreme Court to—day affirmed the judgment for the plaintiff, holding that the court below had jurisdiction and that the action was properly sustained against the company, although the road was operated by the lessees and receiver, and that the act of 1866, permitting a change of route to Washington, did not relive the road from the requirement of the act of 1863, authorizing its extension across the Potomac River, which was that no person should be excluded from their cars on account of color. The court say that it is idle for the company to urge that they always permitted travel on their road without making any distinction on account of color, because they had always carried colored people in their cars. That was not the requirement exacted by Congress. It was that there should be no discrimination in the use of the cars on account of color, and that in respect of such use colored and white should be placed on an equality. This condition was imposed by Congress and accepted by the company, and the latter cannot now evade it. There was no danger that any railroads would refuse to carry colored people in their cars. Self—interest would prevent such a refusal, and it was not necessary for Congressional action to provide against the contingency. Mr. Justice Davis delivered the opinion. This does not decide the general question of the right of the railroad companies to make regulations separating the races in their cars, in the absence of charter provisions prohibiting it.
© 2006–2017
All Rights Reserved
William G. Thomas
Copyright Statement